Everyone is beautiful.
But if everybody is in fact beautiful, then no one is beautiful.
If everyone is foolish, then no one is.
If everyone is rich, then no one is.
If this would have been true, the existence of such words, beautiful, foolish, rich itself, would have been seizen to exist. And so would their antipodes, ugly, skully, poor.
In such a world, it's just the datum, that just reflushes, but to understand this too, one needs to be someone who doesn't belong to the cliché flush.
Now I can't help but just muse, when they say, everyone is unique.
But if everybody is in fact beautiful, then no one is beautiful.
If everyone is foolish, then no one is.
If everyone is rich, then no one is.
If this would have been true, the existence of such words, beautiful, foolish, rich itself, would have been seizen to exist. And so would their antipodes, ugly, skully, poor.
In such a world, it's just the datum, that just reflushes, but to understand this too, one needs to be someone who doesn't belong to the cliché flush.
Now I can't help but just muse, when they say, everyone is unique.
Dear Rugan, nice play with words. However I feel words such as beautiful or foolish were used to categorize and therefore generalizing would be ok. The category of uniqueness is @ differentiation and not categorization. Hence if everyone is unique/differentiated then they remain unique.
ReplyDeleteAnother interesting way .... if all people are human beings then nobody is .....
ReplyDelete